Thursday, December 2, 2010

Babies Born Addicted to Drugs are Not Considered at Imminent Risk. WHAT??

This is so upsetting.  Because so many children were being removed from their homes in OK, laws were changed to keep children in dangerous situation unless there was an "imminent safety threat".  If parents out of their minds on drugs are not an "imminent safety threat" I don't know what is. 

Apparently, "This means a parent with a drug addiction may have child custody if treatment is sought and help is available in the home.   "What constitutes an imminent safety threat? It's not just about drug abuse," Powell said. "It is whether a child is abused or neglected if the drug use impacts care for the child."

I don't know a person whose heavy drug use does not impact their ability to care for their children, yet drug use is not considered an "imminent safety threat".  What they say does not make any sense. 

"When DHS receives a report a child is born addicted to drugs, the agency considers several factors such as health of the child, type of drug and home support for the mother, Powell said.
If the baby's life is in danger or if it is an illegal drug, such as methamphetamine, removal is sought, Powell said.
However, tests may not be immediately available, or prescribed medication may challenge the decision for removal, she said."

This makes me sick.  All types of drugs are dangerous for babies.  When in doubt, wait for the test or further reports about the prescribed medication.  Children's lives should not be gambled with.  This is so frustrating!

Read more from this Tulsa World article at http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=11&articleid=20101202_11_A1_Parent443467

No comments:

Post a Comment